# Forecasting the Winner of a Live Tennis Match

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07617 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07617/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rise of live sports betting in recent years, tennis forecasting has expanded from pre-match prediction to models that update win probabilities as a match unfolds. A central challenge in creating such a model is the constant need for models to adapt to score and performance changes. This study examines how pre-match and live information can be most effectively integrated into a model to produce accurate win-probability estimates. The analysis uses 8,222 Grand Slam matches containing a total of 1,505,355 points. Five models were evaluated using a chronological split, with matches from 2011-2021 used for training, 2022 for validation, and 2023-2024 for testing. Trace, a hybrid model, achieved accuracies of 76.06%, 82.15%, and 88.34% at 25%, 50%, and 75% match progress, suggesting that hybrid modeling is a practical approach to live tennis forecasting.