# Probing the Structure and Dynamics of LLM Value Expression through Value Conflicts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07296 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07296/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11462/) (2020)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [Aligning AI With Shared Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02275/) (2020)
- [A Survey on In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00234/) (2022)
- [DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11698/) (2023)
- [BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11718/) (2021)
- [MAP: Multi-Human-Value Alignment Palette](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19198/) (2024)
- [Policy-as-Prompt: Turning AI Governance Rules into Guardrails for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23994/) (2025)
- [PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19740/) (2024)
- [Dialectal Toxicity Detection: Evaluating LLM-as-a-Judge Consistency Across Language Varieties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10954/) (2024)
- [Multitask Mayhem: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15361/) (2024)
- [TeleAI-Safety: A comprehensive LLM jailbreaking benchmark towards attacks, defenses, and evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.05485/) (2025)
- [Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21033/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Could Be Rote Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08300/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Ethical evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) often characterizes model values as static and monolithic. In contrast, we argue that LLM value expression is better understood as a structured yet dynamic phenomenon. To investigate this, we introduce Conflict-driven Value Probing, a controlled framework that places LLMs in value conflicts and implements four types of interventions that perturb these conflicts to probe LLM value expression. Applying this framework to ten LLMs, we identify three recurring patterns. (1) Expression duality: models shift from broad idealistic orientations in abstract assessment toward more pragmatic priorities in concrete conflicts. (2) Functional steerability: models readily reconfigure their expressed value profiles toward task-defined value objectives. (3) Bounded plasticity: such reconfiguration is not without constraints, i.e. pressure induces a security- and goal-oriented priority shift while negative framing distinguishes protected values from those more amenable to redirection. Together, these findings characterize both the structure and dynamics of LLM value expression: context flexibly reconfigures expressed priorities, yet within behavioral boundaries. This behavioral account provides a foundation for understanding controllability, alignment, and safety in LLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ZeroGen-Lab/CFProbe.