# Selective Posterior Margin Regularization for Forward-Corrected Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05859 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05859/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.05027/) (2016)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07836/) (2018)
- [DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07394/) (2020)
- [Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.03683/) (2016)
- [Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08199/) (2020)
- [Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06112/) (2019)
- [Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09482/) (2017)
- [Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00151/) (2020)
- [Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00068/) (2019)
- [How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04215/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.11238/) (2019)
- [Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6596/) (2014)
- [Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02752/) (2020)
- [Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.10528/) (2020)
- [Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13554/) (2020)
- [Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12088/) (2021)
- [Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05300/) (2018)
- [Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00189/) (2019)
- [SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensembling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01842/) (2019)
- [Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07805/) (2020)
- [Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02130/) (2021)
- [UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14542/) (2022)
- [Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04522/) (2021)
- [Investigating Why Contrastive Learning Benefits Robustness Against Label Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12498/) (2022)
- [CrossSplit: Mitigating Label Noise Memorization through Data Splitting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01674/) (2022)
- [Learning from Noisy Labels via Conditional Distributionally Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17113/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with class-conditional label noise often relies on a transition model from latent clean classes to observed annotations. Forward correction embeds this transition in the likelihood, yet finite-sample networks may still memorize corrupted labels. The corrected likelihood also induces a reverse posterior over the clean classes that could explain each annotation. When its leading class differs from the annotation, the model and transition matrix provide evidence against that annotation, but the leading alternatives can remain nearly tied. We introduce Selective Posterior Margin Regularization (SPMR), which preserves the Forward objective and converts this disagreement into a graded update on the clean classifier. SPMR selects the leading reverse-posterior class, scales a detached pairwise margin by the separation between the two leading posterior classes, and assigns correspondingly little influence to diffuse conflicts. The gap factorizes into transition- adjusted pairwise separation and the posterior mass carried by the leading pair. The active margin follows the locally minimum-norm logit direction that enlarges the selected pairwise margin. Across five known-transition benchmarks, SPMR improves full-length Forward by 2.5-7.0 percentage points and remains 0.7-2.5 percentage points above Forward with Mixup and early stopping. Matched interventions support distinct gains from the posterior-space coefficient, transition-adjusted target, and pairwise action. The same design transfers to estimated transitions, human annotations, architectural changes, and stronger Forward recipes. The formulation uses latent-class evidence already available inside Forward correction without promoting every posterior conflict to a corrected label.