# Do Depressive Facial Patterns Transfer Across Cultures and Contexts? Evidence from a German RCT and E-DAIC

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05543 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05543/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated assessment of depression from facial dynamics holds promise for scalable mental health monitoring, yet cross-corpus generalization of learned biomarkers remains an open challenge. We present a systematic bidirectional transfer study pairing the EmpkinS-EKSpression randomized controlled trial (RCT; N = 256, SCID-5-CV diagnoses) with the Extended Distress Analysis Interview Corpus (E-DAIC; N = 275, semi-structured clinical interviews), predicting depression severity and binary diagnostic status from facial action units, head pose, and gaze. Cross-corpus binary classification proves more robust than continuous PHQ-8 severity regression, with forward transfer achieving AUC = 0.70. Regression transfer is governed by functional context alignment: passive observation phases yield the most transferable models, while active emotion regulation phases elicit stronger within-corpus signals. These findings establish functional context alignment as the primary determinant of cross-corpus generalization, with passive elicitation contexts offering the best trade-off between within-corpus sensitivity and cross-corpus robustness.