# Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Depth-Averaged Granular Avalanche Dynamics on Curved Topography

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05542 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05542/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05767/) (2015)
- [Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01050/) (2021)
- [When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14527/) (2020)
- [Physics-informed neural networks for the shallow-water equations on the sphere](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00615/) (2021)
- [A Physics Informed Machine Learning Framework for Optimal Sensor Placement and Parameter Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15543/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a mesh-free framework for solving governing equations, but their application to granular avalanche dynamics over curved terrain remains largely unexplored. This study extends a depth-averaged PINN formulation based on the Savage-Hutter equations to an exponentially curved chute with spatially varying inclination and a strain-rate-dependent Mohr-Coulomb earth-pressure closure. The model is validated against measured front- and rear-edge trajectories from a laboratory granular-avalanche experiment, with selected observations withheld from training. A staged temporal curriculum proved essential for accurate prediction, reducing the held-out trajectory error by approximately two orders of magnitude compared with training over the full time domain from the outset. Sparse-data experiments further showed that observation placement was more influential than observation number within the configurations tested. Four observations bracketing the transition from acceleration to deceleration achieved nearly the same accuracy as the eight-observation reference configuration, whereas observations clustered at early or late times performed poorly. The results demonstrate the importance of both training strategy and informative data placement when applying PINNs to granular flows over curved topography.