# Knowing What Not to Answer: Selective Non-Compliance in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04720 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.04720/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 45 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14525/) (2023)
- [WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18495/) (2024)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.03416/) (2015)
- [Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03683/) (2019)
- [Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01167/) (2021)
- [Exploring Models and Data for Image Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.02074/) (2015)
- [Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.05910/) (2016)
- [Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07356/) (2016)
- [A Multi-World Approach to Question Answering about Real-World Scenes based on Uncertain Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.0210/) (2014)
- [Yin and Yang: Balancing and Answering Binary Visual Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05099/) (2015)
- [The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12043/) (2024)
- [DRESS: Instructing Large Vision-Language Models to Align and Interact with Humans via Natural Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10081/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) are expected to respond helpfully to appropriate requests while withholding compliance with requests that are incorrect, unsafe, infeasible, or unanswerable. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate non-compliance at the level of the query as a whole, assuming that each request either warrants compliance or requires withholding compliance. In practice, real-world queries can contain a mixture of answerable content and components for which compliance should be withheld. In this paper, we introduce KoNA, a benchmark for evaluating selective non-compliance in VLMs across five categories: False Premise, Visual Inaccessibility, Universal Unknown, Task Feasibility, and Safety. Each task evaluates two capabilities: query-level non-compliance and component-level non-compliance under paired single and compound queries. Our evaluation across diverse VLMs shows that models often fail to refuse, correct, or abstain appropriately, and these failures become more pronounced when queries require selective non-compliance. To address this challenge, we fine-tune VLMs using KoNA examples that require selective non-compliance, together with a fully answerable set that should receive direct answers. Our fine-tuned models achieve substantial improvements in non-compliance accuracy while largely maintaining performance on fully answerable tasks. These results suggest that the fine-tuned models can distinguish between answerable components and those requiring non-compliance and respond in a task-appropriate manner.