# CROCODIL: Cross-Model Code Editing with LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03894 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03894/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [RLTF: Reinforcement Learning from Unit Test Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04349/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08693/) (2018)
- [Can It Edit? Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Follow Code Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12450/) (2023)
- [CoditT5: Pretraining for Source Code and Natural Language Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05446/) (2022)
- [BugsInPy: A Database of Existing Bugs in Python Programs to Enable Controlled Testing and Debugging Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15481/) (2024)
- [RefactorBench: Evaluating Stateful Reasoning in Language Agents Through Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07832/) (2025)
- [EDIT-Bench: Evaluating LLM Abilities to Perform Real-World Instructed Code Edits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04486/) (2025)
- [Tackling Length Inflation Without Trade-offs: Group Relative Reward Rescaling for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10535/) (2026)
- [One Is Not Enough: How People Use Multiple AI Models in Everyday Life](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26107/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous tools for code generation and editing. However, development teams often use multiple LLM assistants. Different developers may prefer different models, and individual developers may switch between models across different coding sessions. Because of this, the edits any one model makes are frequently applied to foreign code originally generated by another model. These LLMs are often trained on different datasets, and as a result have different stylistic preferences. Do LLMs behave differently when they edit foreign code originally written by a different LLM with a different coding style? We find that models tend to make more, and often excessive, edits on foreign code. We introduce CROCODIL (Cross-model Code Editing with LLMs), a post-training framework for reducing excessive edits while preserving functional correctness. CROCODIL's similarity reward penalizes large changes, while its execution reward scores build and test success. We use the product of these two rewards to encourage the policy to decrease the edit size without decreasing the edit task success rate. CROCODIL is available at https://github.com/EngineeringSoftware/Crocodil.