# A Reverse Sign Language Dictionary: Open-Vocabulary Sign Recognition from Continuous Signing via Video Captioning and Description Retrieval

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03788 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03788/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07750/) (2017)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11006/) (2019)
- [BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12131/) (2020)
- [Watch, read and lookup: learning to spot signs from multiple supervisors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04002/) (2020)
- [ASL Citizen: A Community-Sourced Dataset for Advancing Isolated Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05934/) (2023)
- [SignCLIP: Connecting Text and Sign Language by Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01264/) (2024)
- [Towards Zero-shot Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05914/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) is conventionally cast as closed-set classification over gloss labels, which cannot generalize to signs unseen in training and ties every deployment to a gloss-annotated lexicon. We instead recognize signs extracted from continuous signing by (1) captioning a sign-level clip into a free-form procedural description of the articulation with an open-weight vision-language model, and (2) retrieving the closest entry from a vocabulary of target descriptions with a multilingual sentence encoder: a reverse sign language dictionary that needs no gloss supervision and admits an open vocabulary. On 1,300 sign-level segments from a Japanese Sign Language (JSL) dialogue corpus annotated with procedural descriptions (against a 2% top-10 chance floor over the 503-entry target vocabulary), fine-tuning the captioner substantially improves seen-class retrieval: language and vision tower fine-tuning raises top-10 retrieval on seen classes from 4.5% (untrained) to 49%, becoming statistically indistinguishable from a standard supervised closed-set classifier (I3D) on two of the three test sets where a closed-set classifier can be evaluated at all. More importantly, unseen-class retrieval also improves significantly over the untrained pipeline (11.5% -> 21.0% top-10, p=0.0094), a regime in which the closed-set classifier cannot participate. A matcher-side empirical upper-bound analysis shows the sentence encoder already recovers close to 100% of paraphrased gold descriptions, locating a gap in captioning quality that we aim to address in future work. To our knowledge this is the first description-based, open-vocabulary sign lookup from continuous signing without gloss supervision, and the first for JSL.