# RealCADBench: Benchmarking Parametric CAD Modeling from Industrial Design Intents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03773 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03773/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset For Geometric Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06216/) (2018)
- [DeepCAD: A Deep Generative Network for Computer-Aided Design Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09492/) (2021)
- [Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24653/) (2026)
- [SketchGraphs: A Large-Scale Dataset for Modeling Relational Geometry in Computer-Aided Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08506/) (2020)
- [CAD-Recode: Reverse Engineering CAD Code from Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14042/) (2024)
- [Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00248/) (2026)
- [BenchCAD: A Comprehensive, Industry-Standard Benchmark for Programmatic CAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10865/) (2026)
- [Text2CAD-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM-based Text-to-Parametric CAD Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18430/) (2026)
- [CADBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for AI-Assisted CAD Program Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10873/) (2026)
- [P3D-Bench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Parametric 3D Generation and Structural Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11152/) (2026)
- [Zero-to-CAD: Agentic Synthesis of Interpretable CAD Programs at Million-Scale Without Real Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24479/) (2026)
- [MUSE: Benchmarking Manufacturable, Functional, and Assemblable Text-to-CAD Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28579/) (2026)
- [CADEngBench: It Looks Like CAD, but Does It Work? Evaluating Parametric Design, Assembly Reasoning, and Physics Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09296/) (2026)
- [UniCAD: A Unified Benchmark and Universal Model for Multi-Modal Multi-Task CAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05058/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Parametric computer-aided design (CAD) modeling is difficult to evaluate with a single metric. Existing CAD benchmarks often emphasize synthetic or CAD-native settings, limited input modalities, or executability and IoUs alone. We introduce RealCADBench, a benchmark for intent-to-program CAD modeling from real industrial design intents. It contains 12,632 tasks from 19 factory-automation categories and spans text descriptions, 2D engineering drawings, real product pictures, and rendered images for both Part and Assembly modeling. We report results on a 1,770-task evaluation slice: 1,745 Part tasks across four input regimes and RCB-Assm25, a 25-task assembly study used in every reported assembly comparison. Each method generates FreeCAD API Python, which a shared runtime executes to export the 3D model. We evaluate the exported model using executability, Solid IoU, Surface IoU, and a rubric-based visual-semantic identity Judge. Among the nine standalone frontier large models evaluated, no model leads all four metrics. Across six frontier-scale large models, executability ranges from 0.565 to 0.812, Solid IoU from 0.2841 to 0.5379, and Surface IoU from 0.112 to 0.217 across the four Part regimes. The highest regime-balanced composite comes from a different model than the leaders on the four component metrics. On RCB-Assm25, Codex with GPT-5.5 improves executability and both IoU metrics over standalone GPT-5.5, but lowers the Judge score by 6.98 percentage points, leaving GPT-5.5 as the Judge leader. We also observe recurring failure modes, most notably missing fine structures, loss of part identity, and incorrect assembly placement. These results show that execution alone is insufficient to characterize realistic CAD modeling and that frontier models and agents differ substantially across executability, IoUs, and visual-semantic identity.