# Learn from Whoever Is Right: Answer-Verified Multi-Teacher Distillation for Multi-Domain LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02548 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02548/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05482/) (2022)
- [Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06782/) (2020)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18449/) (2025)
- [MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02780/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12275/) (2026)
- [R2E-Gym: Procedural Environments and Hybrid Verifiers for Scaling Open-Weights SWE Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07164/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Multi-Teacher Multi-level Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04062/) (2021)
- [MOPD: Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for Capability Integration in LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30406/) (2026)
- [Reinforced Multi-Teacher Selection for Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06048/) (2020)
- [Nemotron-Cascade 2: Post-Training LLMs with Cascade RL and Multi-Domain On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19220/) (2026)
- [Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02482/) (2026)
- [Nemotron-Cascade: Scaling Cascaded Reinforcement Learning for General-Purpose Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13607/) (2025)
- [Rebellious Student: Reversing Teacher Signals for Reasoning Exploration with Self-Distilled RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10781/) (2026)
- [Advancing General-Purpose Reasoning Models with Modular Gradient Surgery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02301/) (2026)
- [Disentangling Task Conflicts in Multi-Task LoRA via Orthogonal Gradient Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09684/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Distill What You Trust: Reliability-Aware Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.23697/) (2026)
- [Do We Really Need KL Divergence for On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33791/) (2026)
- [Latent-MOPD: Latent Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02381/) (2026)
- [MeSD: Multi-Evidence Self-Distillation for VideoLLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.06342/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern large language models (LLMs) rely on reinforcement learning to build strong capabilities in individual domains, but integrating those capabilities into a single deployable model remains challenging. By routing each sample to the teacher whose domain matches it, existing approaches let a domain label decide which teacher provides supervision. However, domain expertise holds only on average: the matched teacher is not always correct on a given sample, while a teacher from another domain sometimes is. The reliable teacher therefore has to be identified per sample, not per domain. In this paper, we introduce Multi-Teacher Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (MT-SDPO), an on-policy distillation method that unifies several frozen teachers into one student model. MT-SDPO consists of three components: (1) self-anchors, where a rollout is supervised by a correct rollout from its own group; (2) answer-verified eligibility, where a teacher may supervise a sample only if its own answer passes a verifier; and (3) privileged distillation, which merges the anchor and all verified feedback into one context that an exponential moving average self-teacher reads and the student does not, thereby keeping one policy at deployment. Across five students from three model families, MT-SDPO lifts the weakest domain of Qwen3-8B by 14.79 points and narrows its domain gap by 74.7%, a better balance than serving one matched teacher per domain. Verified reliability, not domain membership, should decide who teaches. Code is available at https://github.com/hexixiang/MT-SDPO.