# Morphology signal in whole slide image foundation models can automatically triage slides

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01987 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01987/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04712/) (2018)
- [Whole Slide Images based Cancer Survival Prediction using Attention Guided Deep Multiple Instance Learning Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11169/) (2020)
- [Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19666/) (2024)
- [HEST-1k: A Dataset for Spatial Transcriptomics and Histology Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16192/) (2024)
- [PRISM: A Multi-Modal Generative Foundation Model for Slide-Level Histopathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10254/) (2024)
- [PathAlign: A vision-language model for whole slide images in histopathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19578/) (2024)
- [HVTSurv: Hierarchical Vision Transformer for Patient-Level Survival Prediction from Whole Slide Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17373/) (2023)
- [Atlas: A Novel Pathology Foundation Model by Mayo Clinic, Charit'e, and Aignostics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05409/) (2025)
- [Atlas 2 -- Foundation models for clinical deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05148/) (2026)
- [A Clinically Validated Foundation Model for Comprehensive Lung Pathology Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25878/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Patient exams in the cancer diagnosis and staging process typically generate several whole slide images (WSIs). One of the initial steps in training models on WSI data is identifying one or a few slides containing tumor or other diagnostic biomarkers necessary for downstream prediction tasks such as estimating recurrence risk or progression-free survival. This step requires tedious manual curation by experienced pathologists. Many published datasets make the artificial assumption of 1 slide per patient. Alternatively, all slides per patient may be used for model training, which may dilute the signal from the few slides containing tumor or other relevant information. In this paper, we present a pipeline to overcome these challenges using publicly available WSI foundation models (FMs). Our evaluations show that ranking WSIs based on predictions from zero-shot classification using WSI FMs accurately identifies slides with the most tumor, indicating that WSI FMs contain sufficient morphology signal to automatically triage slides. We also present a formulation for ranked evaluation to benchmark FM performance in slide triage. We show, on multiple datasets, that tumor slides are identified in the top-2 ranked slides for patients with up to 43 slides.