# Does Playing it Safe Count as Faithfulness? Reassessing LVLM Hallucination Mitigation Methods

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01888 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01888/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17911/) (2023)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14003/) (2024)
- [IBD: Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Biased Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18476/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Assembly of Global and Local Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12718/) (2024)
- [Seeing Clearly by Layer Two: Enhancing Attention Heads to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09968/) (2024)
- [Don't Miss the Forest for the Trees: Attentional Vision Calibration for Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17820/) (2024)
- [ICT: Image-Object Cross-Level Trusted Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15268/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Attention Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01969/) (2025)
- [AFTER: Mitigating the Object Hallucination of LVLM via Adaptive Factual-Guided Activation Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01957/) (2026)
- [Context-Aware Decoding for Faithful Vision-Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05939/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent inference-time hallucination mitigation methods for large vision-language models (LVLMs) report strong gains on hallucination benchmarks. However, it remains unclear whether lower hallucination scores reflect improved multimodal grounding or more conservative generation. We evaluate six mitigation methods across three LVLMs and four benchmarks, including hallucination-focused evaluation and the diverse capability benchmark MMStar. Our analysis reveals two consistent patterns. First, hallucination reduction is often coupled with reduced informativeness: methods that lower hallucination rates also reduce object recall, visual coverage, or response detailedness. Second, improvements on hallucination benchmarks do not reliably transfer to broader multimodal capabilities, with methods showing inconsistent or degraded performance on fine-grained perception and reasoning tasks. Our findings suggest that current evaluation protocols may overestimate progress by rewarding conservative generation. We argue that hallucination mitigation should be evaluated as a faithfulness--informativeness--capability trade-off rather than through hallucination scores alone.