# Prompt-Space Meta-Learning Does Not Transfer Across Users: A Frozen-LLM Negative Result

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01615 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01615/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 79 of its 88 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 79)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03400/) (2017)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05175/) (2017)
- [Matching Networks for One Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04080/) (2016)
- [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08909/) (2020)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11511/) (2023)
- [MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08560/) (2023)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04426/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09118/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01282/) (2020)
- [Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10897/) (2019)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12832/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01910/) (2022)
- [On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02999/) (2018)
- [Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05439/) (2020)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00808/) (2020)
- [DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03714/) (2023)
- [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07243/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Personalizing a frozen large language model (LLM) to individual users is often framed as a meta-learning problem in prompt space: each user is a task, and one seeks a shared natural-language adaptation policy that, given a handful of the user's labeled interactions, configures the frozen model for that user. The framing is attractive because it is backbone-agnostic and reuses the machinery of prompt optimization, yet the field rarely tests whether the optimized meta-objective encodes transferable cross-user adaptation rather than generic instruction quality. We study this question with Muse (Meta-learned User-adaptation via Shared Evolution), which evolves a single shared adaptation prompt over a meta-train user population by reflective prompt evolution, freezes it, and applies it zero-shot to held-out users; matched controls isolate learning from confounds of phrasing and selection. On two standard personalization benchmarks (LaMP-2 categorization and LaMP-3 rating) over 200 held-out users each, Muse does not significantly improve on its own un-evolved seed prompt or on a structure-broken control that meta-trains on mismatched user-support pairs, and is dominated by plain few-shot retrieval on the rating task (Delta MAE +0.175, p < 0.001). We attribute these outcomes to a single mechanism, meta-objective collapse: the meta-validation objective is statistically invariant to whether the user-support correspondence is genuine (p=0.555 on LaMP-2, p=0.622 on LaMP-3), so it cannot be optimized into transferable adaptation and instead rewards instruction polish and validation overfitting. The seed-prompt, wrong-support, and invariance-oracle controls form a reusable protocol that separates learned adaptation from these confounds.