# Capability-Gated Language Models: Security Composes, Utility Does Not

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00445 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00445/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/safety/safety-alignment-refusal-and-guardrails/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10771/) (2019)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03819/) (2023)
- [Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05162/) (2024)
- [Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10348/) (2023)
- [Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14499/) (2025)
- [An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18025/) (2024)
- [The MiniPile Challenge for Data-Efficient Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08442/) (2023)
- [Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08827/) (2024)
- [Deep Hierarchical Learning with Nested Subspace Networks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17874/) (2025)
- [No More, No Less: Least-Privilege Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.23157/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deployed language model safeguards (safety fine-tuning, filtering, unlearning) vary by principal only outside the model weights: filters are reconfigured, tiers are multiplied, and artefacts are reissued; inside one set of weights every request meets the same model configuration. This motivates us to define capability-gated deployment: per-principal access control inside one set of weights, whose configurations form a lattice - meets accumulate a principal's restrictions and joins pool a coalition's reach. We instantiate it by sparse rank gating over an existing nested-factorisation mechanism, guide profile search with one-pass attribution, and read every result once from a pre-registered held-out split. Security approximately composes: provably exactly at meets under a monotone-elicitation assumption we falsify pointwise. In two lineages the median held-out meet deepens suppression; the one effect surviving correction strengthens it. Utility does not: individually harmless profiles can compose to retention and fluency damage, and no compositional bound exists.
