# A Lagrangian View of Flow Matching

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00198 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00198/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Flow matching, time series and science](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/flow-matching-time-series-and-science/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Consistency Models Made Easy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14548/) (2024)
- [Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07507/) (2024)
- [How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18825/) (2025)
- [Denoising: A Powerful Building-Block for Imaging, Inverse Problems, and Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06219/) (2024)
- [On the Posterior Distribution in Denoising: Application to Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13598/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern explicit-time generative models, such as Flow Matching [Lipman et al., 2023] and Rectified Flow [Liu et al., 2023], are typically derived top-down via Optimal Transport and the continuity equation. This standard Eulerian approach focuses on the macroscopic transport of probability mass. In this paper, we present an alternative, bottom-up mechanical derivation grounded in a Lagrangian (particle-centric) perspective. By analyzing the local Taylor expansion of a continuous denoiser, we motivate a strict invariance condition required for optimal, singlestep generation: the conservation of target identity. Enforcing this condition yields a governing quasi-linear advection Partial Differential Equation (PDE). We demonstrate that solving this PDE via the Method of Characteristics analytically yields the straight-line trajectories of Flow Matching. This geometric perspective isolates the Jacobian of the denoiser as the primary source of trajectory curvature, providing a direct mathematical explanation for why straight-line flows enable massive step sizes, and why empirical models require distillation to flatten intersecting characteristics.