# Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31111 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31111/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Self-evolving LLM agents, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs.
- Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-evolving LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-evolving-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13081/) (2020)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07095/) (2024)
- [Automated Design of Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08435/) (2024)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22954/) (2025)
- [Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06585/) (2023)
- [Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03335/) (2025)
- [R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05004/) (2025)
- [AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13138/) (2025)
- [RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15114/) (2024)
- [Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20857/) (2025)
- [DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17453/) (2024)
- [Self-Adapting Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10943/) (2025)
- [PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08640/) (2026)
- [SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20087/) (2026)
- [Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07663/) (2026)
- [SELA: Tree-Search Enhanced LLM Agents for Automated Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17238/) (2024)
- [The Red Queen G"odel Machine: Co-Evolving Agents and Their Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26294/) (2026)
- [Co-Harness: Co-Evolving Harnesses and Model Weights for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22688/) (2026)
- [RSIBench-Data: Benchmarking Data-Centric Research for Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25886/) (2026)
- [AI4AI-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Algorithmic Design for Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20318/) (2026)
- [Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27191/) (2026)
- [PAST-Bench: Benchmarking the Foundations of Recursive Self-Improvement in Personal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04003/) (2026)
- [Frontis-MA1: Training an AI4AI Model towards Recursive Self-Improvement in Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28568/) (2026)
- [HELIX: Model-Harness Co-evolution for Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13951/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [The Last AI Built by Humans: Toward Genuine Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11873/) (2026)
- [ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14857/) (2026)
- [MMPostTrainBench: Benchmarking Autonomous Research for Multimodal Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05398/) (2026)
- [From Existing Methods to New Research Ideas: Two Perspectives on Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14625/) (2026)
- [EvoCowork: A Benchmark for Real-World Office Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14828/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many important forms of human learning begin with a vague goal, such as "become a better physicist" or "improve at research." Learners must interpret the goal, identify capability gaps, decide how to learn, and determine whether they have actually improved. In contrast, existing work on LLM self-evolution typically begins with tasks and evaluation metrics specified by humans, reducing self-evolution to optimizing an explicit objective rather than deciding what and how to learn. We introduce ASPIRE, a benchmark for vague-goal-driven self-evolution. ASPIRE provides only a natural-language capability goal while downstream evaluation tasks remain hidden. The agent must operationalize the goal by choosing data and update methods, constructing training and validation signals, and deciding when to evaluate. ASPIRE supports both model-weight and agent-harness evolution in a unified interactive environment and evaluates the resulting systems on a hidden, expert-authored set of 520 items spanning six goals. Our experiments show that vague goals redirect search effort toward goal interpretation. Current agents routinely complete training and harness-editing loops, but weight-level gains remain sparse and unstable, and the strongest evolved harness remains below the engineered Qwen-Agent reference. Agents often train on mismatched data and trust narrow self-evaluations, so local gains fail to transfer to hidden evaluation and continued search and training can erase earlier improvements.