# LISynSeg: Data-Centric Label-to-Image Synthesis for Cross-Modality Whole-Heart Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31073 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31073/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06650/) (2016)
- [UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10504/) (2021)
- [Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01266/) (2022)
- [Multivariate mixture model for myocardium segmentation combining multi-source images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08820/) (2016)
- [Evaluation of Algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An Open-Access Grand Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07880/) (2019)
- [BayeSeg: Bayesian Modeling for Medical Image Segmentation with Interpretable Generalizability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01710/) (2023)
- [SIAM: Head and Brain MRI Segmentation from Few High-Quality Templates via Synthetic Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02737/) (2026)
- [Deep infant brain segmentation from multi-contrast MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.05114/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Whole-heart segmentation (WHS) in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is affected by acquisition shifts and heterogeneous cardiac annotations. Existing WHS systems combine architectural design, transfer learning, and generic spatial or intensity augmentation. We investigate whether changes to data augmentation and training supervision can improve cross-modality WHS while the segmentation architecture is held constant. We present LISynSeg, a data-centric approach that augments real-image nnU-Net training with label-to-image synthesis. Synthetic volumes are generated from cardiac label maps using contrast and acquisition perturbations calibrated to the training cohort, then mixed with real images to retain thoracic context absent from the labels (and thus the synthesized images). We model cardiac label variation through controlled changes in myocardial wall thickness and partial supervision of uncertain vessel endpoints. On the CARE Whole-Heart benchmark, synthetic-only training performs worse than the real-image nnU-Net baseline, whereas calibrated real-synthetic training improves cross-modality segmentation without changing the architecture; the improvement is larger for MRI than for CT. The results show that modifying the training data strategy can benefit model development for heterogeneous cardiac data. Code and trained weights will be released at https://github.com/MedICL-VU/Care26_LISynSeg.
