# Centering before Pruning: Lightweight Geometry Correction for Diversity-Based Visual Token Pruning in LVLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30263 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30263/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Visual token pruning in multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/inference/visual-token-pruning-in-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17005/) (2023)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09126/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02713/) (2024)
- [Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01818/) (2024)
- [Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10967/) (2025)
- [Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02912/) (2025)
- [MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18264/) (2025)
- [Prune Redundancy, Preserve Essence: Vision Token Compression in VLMs via Synergistic Importance-Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09480/) (2026)
- [A More Word-like Image Tokenization for MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17954/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CoViST: Visual Token Compression via Composable States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33397/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) incur substantial inference costs due to their long and highly redundant visual-token sequences. Diversity-based pruning mitigates this cost by selecting token subsets based on pairwise cosine similarity. We find, however, that similarities between raw visual tokens are strongly concentrated in the positive range, limiting their ability to distinguish non-redundant tokens. A natural way to improve this resolution is to center token features before computing cosine similarity. Centering indeed reveals a substantially richer pairwise structure, yet unexpectedly degrades pruning performance when used alone. We show that this apparent contradiction arises because the raw geometry does more than represent pairwise diversity: it also implicitly favors globally distinctive tokens, which tend to contain semantically informative content. Centering better resolves subset diversity but loses this useful token-wise preference, revealing that diversity and distinctiveness are entangled in the raw geometry. Based on this analysis, we propose the Centered Geometry Pruner (Cen-Prune), which measures subset diversity using centered cosine similarity while retaining raw-space distinctiveness as a complementary token-wise preference. This lightweight, plug-and-play correction leaves the underlying selection mechanism unchanged and incurs negligible computational overhead. Extensive experiments across multiple image- and video-understanding benchmarks and LVLM architectures demonstrate that Cen-Prune provides robust improvements in overall performance across existing diversity-based pruners.