# ReTrace: Rejected-Trajectory Conditioning for Speculative Decoding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29748 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29748/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Speculative decoding, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving.
- Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Speculative decoding](https://mlsanity.com/inference/speculative-decoding/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17192/) (2022)
- [Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10774/) (2024)
- [EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15077/) (2024)
- [EAGLE-2: Faster Inference of Language Models with Dynamic Draft Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16858/) (2024)
- [EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01840/) (2025)
- [DFlash: Block Diffusion for Flash Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06036/) (2026)
- [PEARL: Parallel Speculative Decoding with Adaptive Draft Length](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11850/) (2024)
- [Turning Trash into Treasure: Accelerating Inference of Large Language Models with Token Recycling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08696/) (2024)
- [DSpark: Confidence-Scheduled Speculative Decoding with Semi-Autoregressive Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05147/) (2026)
- [The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20370/) (2024)
- [Domino: Decoupling Causal Modeling from Autoregressive Drafting in Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29707/) (2026)
- [JetSpec: Breaking the Scaling Ceiling of Speculative Decoding with Parallel Tree Drafting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18394/) (2026)
- [Make Every Draft Count: Hidden State based Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.21224/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Reciprocal Guidance: Orchestrating Draft and Verify Budgets for Advancing the Diffusion-AR Self-Speculation Frontier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34388/) (2026)
- [DRelay: Global Draft Context for Prefix-Aware Parallel Speculative Decoding Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01439/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive language model inference by having a lightweight draft model propose multiple candidate tokens, which are then verified in parallel by a larger target model. However, after the first rejection, standard prefix-based verification discards the remaining draft suffix, so the computation spent generating and verifying those positions does not contribute to decoding progress. Focusing on DFlash, we show that rejected positions in a rejected suffix may still align with the target continuation, indicating that the draft model can retain useful semantic and structural information despite local token-level errors. Motivated by this observation and inspired by conditional diffusion, we introduce ReTrace, a rejected-trajectory conditioning method that conditions each draft block on the rejected suffix from the previous round rather than generating it from fresh mask placeholders alone. ReTrace retains the hidden representations of the rejected suffixes, aligns them with the next draft block, refines them using target-aware correction signals from the same verification pass, and admits them into the drafter's input embeddings through gated residual fusion. Because rejected tokens are never committed and target-side verification remains unchanged, ReTrace preserves the lossless property of speculative decoding without requiring an additional model forward pass. Experiments with Qwen3 models across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and open-ended dialogue demonstrate that ReTrace consistently improves average acceptance length and end-to-end decoding speed over its DFlash backbone. By introducing cross-round conditioning without modifying within-round proposal generation, ReTrace is largely orthogonal to existing drafting improvements and might be combined with them for further gains.