# Text-Guided Diffusion-Based Adversarial Attacks on Chest X-Ray Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29456/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical imaging and segmentation, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Medical imaging and segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/medical-imaging-and-segmentation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08401/) (2016)
- [CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05225/) (2017)
- [Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10456/) (2019)
- [Evaluating the Clinical Realism of Synthetic Chest X-Rays Generated Using Progressively Growing GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03975/) (2020)
- [Instruct2Attack: Language-Guided Semantic Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15551/) (2023)
- [Vulnerability Analysis of Chest X-Ray Image Classification Against Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02905/) (2018)
- [A Thorough Comparison Study on Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Common Thorax Disease Classification in Chest X-rays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13969/) (2020)
- [Prompt2Perturb (P2P): Text-Guided Diffusion-Based Adversarial Attacks on Breast Ultrasound Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09910/) (2024)
- [On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Chest X-ray Classification: Pitfalls and Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08130/) (2022)
- [CoRPA: Adversarial Image Generation for Chest X-rays Using Concept Vector Perturbations and Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05214/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation, triage, and clinical decision support, understanding its vulnerability to adversarial manipulation is critical for safe deployment. Existing robustness evaluations, however, predominantly rely on pixel-space attacks that introduce numerically constrained perturbations but may not represent plausible radiographic variation. This limitation is particularly important in multi-disease CXR classification, where models simultaneously evaluate multiple overlapping pathologies and adversarial failures may alter several diagnostic predictions. We propose a text-guided diffusion-based adversarial framework that optimizes learnable text conditioning while keeping the diffusion generator and target classifier frozen, enabling adversarial generation through a learned image prior rather than direct pixel manipulation. We evaluate the framework across multiple classifier architectures in both binary atelectasis and multi-disease CXR classification and compare it with FGSM, PGD, and Carlini-Wagner attacks. Our approach consistently produced the greatest degradation in classifier performance, reducing AUROC to 0.3885-0.5646 in binary classification and 0.4441-0.4878 in the multi-disease setting, while achieving superior image fidelity (SSIM 0.9080, LPIPS 0.1670, FID 51.23). Importantly, clinician interpretation remained unchanged for 95.9% of binary and 73.8% of multi-disease adversarial images despite substantial changes in model predictions. These findings reveal a clinically important discrepancy between human and machine interpretation and demonstrate the need to extend medical AI robustness evaluation beyond conventional pixel-space attacks toward generative threat models that can expose failures under visually and clinically plausible image variations.
