# Cloud and On-Premises Deployment of Uzbek Legal RAG via Targeted Retriever Fine-Tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29284 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29284/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17192/) (2022)
- [Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01318/) (2023)
- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03563/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying large language models for legal question answering raises challenges that general-purpose leaderboards do not capture, particularly for low-resource languages and under hard operational constraints. We report on building and operating a retrieval-augmented (RAG) legal assistant for Uzbek that must run in two regimes: a managed cloud service that maximizes answer quality within a per-token cost ceiling, and an on-premises deployment for clients whose legal data may not leave their infrastructure, restricting us to open-weight models on limited local hardware under latency constraints. Because no evaluation existed for this setting, we build two domain benchmarks: a retrieval benchmark of 178 expert-annotated legal queries with gold provision spans, and an end-to-end benchmark of 504 expert-curated question--answer pairs scored by an LLM judge whose ratings we validate against human judgments and against an independent-family judge. Applying these benchmarks under each regime, we find the open-versus-proprietary gap is small and cheaply closed by fine-tuning. Therefore, we train UTE-1, which is a state-of-the-art text embedder among open models for Uzbek. We also demonstrate that closing the performance gap via fine-tuning is both impractical due to the intensive hardware demands of long-context legal Q&A and unnecessary, given that legal acts change frequently. We support this by reporting a negative result from a QLoRA experiment. We distill practical guidance for similar deployments, drawn from a system serving real users in production. We release our benchmarks, evaluation code and the fine-tuned embedder (UTE-1) hrefhttps://metric-ai-lab.github.io/Uzbek-Legal-RAG/at this https URL to support future work on low-resource legal NLP.