# Capability-Stratified Degradation in Ternary Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28809 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28809/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.3432/) (2013)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06209/) (2017)
- [The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17764/) (2024)
- [QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11473/) (2019)
- [BitNet: Scaling 1-bit Transformers for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11453/) (2023)
- [Low-Bit Quantization Favors Undertrained LLMs: Scaling Laws for Quantized LLMs with 100T Training Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17691/) (2024)
- [PTQTP: Post-Training Quantization to Trit-Planes for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16989/) (2025)
- [TWLA: Achieving Ternary Weights and Low-Bit Activations for LLMs via Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13054/) (2026)
- [CAT-Q: Cost-efficient and Accurate Ternary Quantization for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26650/) (2026)
- [Attend to Your Own Thoughts: Breaking the Barrier for Post-Training Quantization of Reasoning LLMs through the Lens of 1.58-Bit Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01078/) (2026)
- [An Extra RMSNorm is All You Need for Fine Tuning to 1.58 Bits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08823/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Post-Training Ternarization of Qwen3-4B Capability, Effective Bit Budget, Storage Compression, and Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01962/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Extreme low-bit inference offers a route toward smaller models and constrained deployment. Ternary language models restrict weights to -1,0,+1, approaching the limit of log2 3 ≈ 1.585 bits/weight. The practical question for a pretrained model is not simply whether weights can be quantised but which capabilities survive and whether it remains useful for adaptation. We explore this by converting Qwen3.5-0.8B (752M parameters) to ternary weights using 72.4M tokens of quantisation-aware training (QAT). The resulting model, Cloe, is evaluated across 29 benchmarks, representation diagnostics, and downstream fine-tuning. The evidence shows non-uniform degradation. A linear probe recovers 43.76% of MMLU answers from the full-precision teacher's representations but only 26.19% from Cloe (near chance), indicating specialist factual information is lost. However, Cloe retains measurable performance on ten tasks, averaging 77.1% of teacher performance. Crucially, fine-tuning raises Cloe to 89.8% on SST-2 (95.6% of the matched teacher) and reaches 79.4% teacher retention on XSum. We attribute degradation to a combination of quantisation-induced information loss and incomplete recovery due to the limited QAT budget. We also highlight an evaluation pitfall: standard answer-letter scoring failed (Cloe emitted "A" on 98.6% of MMLU questions), necessitating continuation scoring. Ultimately, ternary conversion is unsuitable as a drop-in general replacement yet remains valuable as a compact substrate for task-specific models.