# Evaluating Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Translation Error Detection:An English--Greek Contrastive Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28776 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28776/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01852/) (2020)
- [Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09813/) (2020)
- [Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05672/) (2024)
- [CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06243/) (2022)
- [ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15615/) (2022)
- [It's not a Non-Issue: Negation as a Source of Error in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05432/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual sentence embeddings are increasingly used to estimate semantic similarity across languages, yet their sensitivity to fine-grained translation errors remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates whether general-purpose multilingual embedding models can distinguish correct English-Greek translations from minimally modified erroneous alternatives. A contrastive dataset was developed from FLORES+ sentence-aligned reference translations and reviewed by two translation experts. It contains 1,850 examples across ten core and five exploratory error categories, covering factual, lexical-semantic, grammatical, relational, referential, and discourse-level phenomena. Five multilingual sentence-embedding models (BGE-M3, Multilingual E5, Multilingual MPNet, LaBSE, and Jina Embeddings v3) were evaluated using cosine similarity between each English source sentence and its correct and erroneous Greek translations. A reference-free COMETKiwi model was also evaluated as an MT quality-estimation baseline. Performance was assessed through contrastive accuracy and score margins for category-specific sensitivity. BGE-M3 achieved the highest accuracy among embedding models at 89.30 percent, while COMETKiwi achieved 94.49 percent. Embedding models detected explicit factual and lexical changes more reliably than tense-and-aspect and pronoun-coreference errors. COMETKiwi improved performance on several difficult categories, including tense and aspect, pronoun and coreference, and semantic-role errors, but showed lower sensitivity to date-and-time errors and underperformed the embedding models on numbers. The results show complementary error-sensitivity profiles: multilingual sentence embeddings provide useful semantic adequacy signals but are better suited as components of broader translation-evaluation frameworks than as standalone metrics.