# Improving Spatial-Temporal Reasoning in Video-Language Models with Structured Video Prompting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28666 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28666/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02858/) (2023)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07895/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02713/) (2024)
- [Tarsier: Recipes for Training and Evaluating Large Video Description Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00634/) (2024)
- [LITA: Language Instructed Temporal-Localization Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19046/) (2024)
- [Momentor: Advancing Video Large Language Model with Fine-Grained Temporal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11435/) (2024)
- [TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10818/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00238/) (2024)
- [MoReVQA: Exploring Modular Reasoning Models for Video Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06511/) (2024)
- [MMSI-Video-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Video-Based Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10863/) (2025)
- [Visual Structures Helps Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22146/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Grounding IDs: How External Cues Shape Multimodal Binding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24072/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Video-language models (VLMs) remain brittle on tasks that require tracking events over time and grounding answers in specific spatial regions. We propose that part of this limitation can be addressed through better organization of visual evidence at inference time. We introduce structured video prompting, a training-free inference-time method that augments the input video with lightweight spatial structure and temporal structure, providing explicit anchors for organizing evidence across space and time without changing model weights or decoding and without altering the question prompt in the main comparison. We evaluate this approach on two complementary video benchmarks and two open video-language models. Across these settings, structured inputs improve performance in several cases, with gains varying by model and task. Our findings suggest that some failures of VLMs arise not only from reasoning capacity, but also from how video evidence is presented at inference time. These results highlight structured video prompting as a simple and practical direction for improving video understanding.
