# Cyc3D: Evaluating Cyclic Structural Stability and Asset Usability in Image-to-3D Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28080 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28080/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Magic3D: High-Resolution Text-to-3D Content Creation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10440/) (2022)
- [ProlificDreamer: High-Fidelity and Diverse Text-to-3D Generation with Variational Score Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16213/) (2023)
- [LRM: Large Reconstruction Model for Single Image to 3D](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04400/) (2023)
- [One-2-3-45: Any Single Image to 3D Mesh in 45 Seconds without Per-Shape Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16928/) (2023)
- [Latent-NeRF for Shape-Guided Generation of 3D Shapes and Textures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07600/) (2022)
- [One-2-3-45++: Fast Single Image to 3D Objects with Consistent Multi-View Generation and 3D Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07885/) (2023)
- [GPT-4V(ision) is a Human-Aligned Evaluator for Text-to-3D Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04092/) (2024)
- [MeshFormer: High-Quality Mesh Generation with 3D-Guided Reconstruction Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10198/) (2024)
- [Gen3DEval: Using vLLMs for Automatic Evaluation of Generated 3D Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08125/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking and Learning Multi-Dimensional Quality Evaluator for Text-to-3D Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11170/) (2024)
- [Hi3DEval: Advancing 3D Generation Evaluation with Hierarchical Validity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05609/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Image-conditioned 3D generation has advanced rapidly, yet existing evaluation protocols largely judge rendered-view plausibility and semantic alignment, overlooking whether a generator forms a stable 3D interpretation and produces assets usable in graphics pipelines. We introduce Cyc3D, a multidimensional benchmark that evaluates image-to-3D generation along two complementary axes: Cross-View Object Consistency and Representation Quality. At the asset level, Cyc3D measures whether object identity remains semantically coherent across rendered viewpoints. At the model level, we propose View-Cycle Structural Consistency, a closed-loop render-regenerate-align protocol that repeatedly re-observes a generated asset from novel views and quantifies geometric, perceptual, and semantic drift across generations. To assess native asset usability beyond rendered appearance, Cyc3D further evaluates geometric structure, reference-image fidelity, mesh discretization and efficiency, and UV parameterization quality. Together, these diagnostics expose failures obscured by a single perceptual score and provide interpretable evidence of both model instability and representation defects. Experiments on five representative image-to-3D systems show that closed-source feed-forward models consistently outperform open-source optimization-based baselines in geometric fidelity, mesh quality, and cycle stability. Nevertheless, even the strongest methods achieve cycle-stability scores below 48, revealing a persistent gap between visually plausible generation and robust 3D object understanding.