# A Statistical Audit of Physical AI Benchmark Redundancy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25940 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25940/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07895/) (2023)
- [RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10721/) (2024)
- [RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16537/) (2024)
- [RoboRefer: Towards Spatial Referring with Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04308/) (2025)
- [SAT: Dynamic Spatial Aptitude Training for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07755/) (2024)
- [OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03135/) (2025)
- [MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21458/) (2025)
- [RoboBrain 2.0 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02029/) (2025)
- [Revealing the structure of language model capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10062/) (2023)
- [Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15722/) (2025)
- [VisionArena: 230K Real World User-VLM Conversations with Preference Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08687/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physical AI models are evaluated on suites of benchmarks that differ across model reports, leaving the model-by-benchmark matrix sparse and the relationship between benchmarks unmeasured. We construct a matrix of 51 models on 12 physical AI benchmarks, selected from a registry of 51 benchmarks and 152 models by reporting density, combining scores from model cards and benchmark papers with our own evaluation runs under each benchmark's official protocol. We measure how much information the benchmarks share and show quantitative evidence of Redundancy. Redundancy affects reported rankings: collapsing the two substitute pairs into single columns moves 22 of 51 models by three or more places under an equally weighted average. We then select benchmarks greedily under a utility combining score dispersion with variance not explained by the already-selected set, and obtain a four-benchmark subset retaining 78.5% of the utility of all 12, on which we fit a Bradley--Terry ranking. The procedure requires only benchmark-level scores with sufficient overlap and is not specific to physical AI.