# Beyond Scaling: Self-Evolving LLM Agents for Hardware Kernel Optimization via an Experience-Driven Workflow and Experience Graph Memory

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25570 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25570/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)
- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-evolving LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-evolving-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08560/) (2023)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10517/) (2025)
- [ChipNeMo: Domain-Adapted LLMs for Chip Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00176/) (2023)
- [Remember Me, Refine Me: A Dynamic Procedural Memory Framework for Experience-Driven Agent Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10696/) (2025)
- [Astra: A Multi-Agent System for GPU Kernel Performance Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07506/) (2025)
- [QiMeng-Kernel: Macro-Thinking Micro-Coding Paradigm for LLM-Based High-Performance GPU Kernel Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20100/) (2025)
- [Hierarchical Context Pruning: Optimizing Real-World Code Completion with Repository-Level Pretrained Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18294/) (2024)
- [Fine-Tuning GPT-5 for GPU Kernel Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11000/) (2026)
- [From Tokens to Regions: CUDA-Sensitive Instruction Tuning for GPU Kernel Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16231/) (2026)
- [CANN Bench: Benchmarking Agent Generated Kernels against Real NPU and Algorithmic Limits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20518/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hardware kernel optimization requires repeated compilation, correctness testing, profiling, and revision. LLM agents can automate parts of this process, and stronger foundation models, longer context windows, and longer execution horizons have improved optimization within individual tasks. These advances alone do not enable an agent to learn from completed optimization runs. Existing kernel-optimization agents seldom preserve a decision, its observed execution feedback, and the later decisions that use that evidence. Retaining every prior trajectory is also impractical because an expanding history competes with the current task for context. We present KOPE, an experience-driven framework for hardware kernel optimization. KOPE records optimization trajectories with correctness and performance feedback in Experience Graph Memory, then uses Active Context Management and Injection to retrieve relevant experience under a fixed token budget. The graph retains decision order, observed outcomes, and alternative branches, allowing evidence collected on the target hardware to inform later optimization steps and tasks. Under the same GLM-5.2 setting, the geometric mean of KOPE's per-operator speedups is 1.54× that of CANNBot, the strongest competing baseline. In a complete 53-operator ablation, Active Context Management and Injection raises pass rate from 60.0% to 84.6%, increases the evaluator-reported positive-field geometric mean from 0.0382 to 0.0661, and reduces optimization token consumption from 15.9B to 1.113B tokens relative to passive agent-led context construction. Enabling Experience Graph Memory raises full-suite pass rate from 55.2% to 84.6% and yields a 1.43× geometric-mean speedup on valid timing comparisons. These results support continual optimization through external experience while the foundation model remains fixed.