# Physics-Informed Foresight Pruning for Sparse PINN Solvers of Nonlinear PDEs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25564 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25564/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14527/) (2020)
- [Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07376/) (2020)
- [PirateNets: Physics-informed Deep Learning with Residual Adaptive Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00326/) (2024)
- [DPM: A Novel Training Method for Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02681/) (2020)
- [Hypernetwork-based Meta-Learning for Low-Rank Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09528/) (2023)
- [Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09446/) (2024)
- [NTK-SAP: Improving neural network pruning by aligning training dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02840/) (2023)
- ["Lossless" Compression of Deep Neural Networks: A High-dimensional Neural Tangent Kernel Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00258/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often rely on over-parameterized models to optimize coupled solution and differential-residual objectives, leaving unclear how much capacity is necessary and what pruning should preserve. We study foresight pruning at initialization for sparse PirateNet PDE solvers. Standard neural tangent kernel spectrum-aware pruning (NTK-SAP) aims to preserve output-side training dynamics but may overlook parameters whose main influence arises through derivatives in the governing equations. We introduce physics-informed spectrum-aware pruning (PI-SAP), which assigns saliency using sensitivity of the PDE residual. Experiments on the Gray-Scott equations, complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Burgers' equation, and linear convection equation show that PI-SAP more consistently preserves Gray-Scott residual fidelity and is competitive under aggressive sparsity. However, no criterion is uniformly optimal across equations or sparsity levels. Small-batch PINN-NTK diagnostics further show that residual fidelity, solution accuracy, and kernel conditioning are distinct objectives, motivating pruning methods that explicitly balance solution-side and residual-side training dynamics during optimization.