# When Does Frequency Decomposition Benefit Physics-Informed Neural Networks? A Preliminary Ablation Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24940 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24940/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09661/) (2020)
- [Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10739/) (2020)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05767/) (2015)
- [Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01050/) (2021)
- [When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14527/) (2020)
- [DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04502/) (2019)
- [Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05624/) (2022)
- [Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.06523/) (2019)
- [Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.04544/) (2020)
- [Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07871/) (2021)
- [Large-scale Neural Solvers for Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03730/) (2020)
- [Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Frequency and Multi-Scale Problems using Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02810/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Partial differential equations (PDEs) often have high-frequency and multi-scale features that neural networks struggle to approximate. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) build the governing equations directly into training, but suffer from spectral bias: they learn low-frequency components faster than high-frequency ones. Techniques such as Fourier feature embeddings and sinusoidal activations address this, but most studies assume they help across the board without checking which spectral regimes actually benefit. We introduce a dual-branch, spectrally-gated architecture (DBSG-PINN) that splits low- and high-frequency components into separate subnetworks joined by an adaptive gate, and use it to run a partially controlled ablation of frequency decomposition and spectral routing. We test this on five one-dimensional benchmark PDEs, ranging from smooth, single-scale problems to oscillatory, multi-scale ones. Frequency decomposition helps most on the spectrally complex benchmarks, cutting relative L2 error by up to 59.2% on a multimodal wave problem, but gives little benefit on smoother PDEs. On one benchmark (1D Wave), it performs substantially worse than a simpler fixed-combination variant. The gate's benefit scales with how spectrally rich the target solution is: the full model's advantage over the ablations is largest on multi-scale benchmarks and smallest (or negative) on single-scale ones, consistent with the gate exploiting frequency structure rather than acting as noise,though we do not directly visualize or quantify its spatial activations in this study. All results come from a single training seed across five 1D benchmarks, so we present this as an exploratory study meant to raise questions rather than answer them, and outline the additional seeds and benchmarks needed to test whether the pattern holds.