# PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24509 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24509/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splitting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18677/) (2023)
- [LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11477/) (2023)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10498/) (2022)
- [MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20453/) (2025)
- [MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14704/) (2025)
- [MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00933/) (2026)
- [LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01780/) (2025)
- [MCPMark: A Benchmark for Stress-Testing Realistic and Comprehensive MCP Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24002/) (2025)
- [CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02734/) (2025)
- [MCPToolBench++: A Large Scale AI Agent Model Context Protocol MCP Tool Use Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07575/) (2025)
- [TPS-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents' Tool Planning & Scheduling Abilities in Compounding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01527/) (2025)
- [CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15309/) (2026)
- [R-ConstraintBench: Evaluating LLMs on NP-Complete Scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15204/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SchemaFill: Efficient LLM Tool Calling via Slot-Parallel Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07086/) (2026)
- [TaReD: Tool-Aware Recursive Decomposition for Long-Horizon Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11268/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents increasingly solve tasks by invoking multiple tools, where parallel execution is essential for low latency but difficult to manage safely. Existing agent benchmarks primarily evaluate tool selection, argument generation, and end-to-end success under mostly serial execution, largely overlooking valid parallelization and resource-constrained scheduling. This missing scheduling dimension creates a practical failure mode: serial execution is safe but slow, while resource-agnostic parallel execution is fast but prone to avoidable resource overflows. To address this gap, we introduce PeakBench, a benchmark of executable multi-tool workflows with execution-grounded dependency annotations and measured resource profiles. A central challenge in evaluating such workflows is attribution: failures and inefficiencies may arise from incorrect dependency planning, poor resource-constrained scheduling, or both. PeakBench addresses this challenge with a two-part evaluation framework that disentangles logical planning from physical scheduling, with dedicated metrics for each dimension. Using this framework, we show that strong logical planning does not reliably translate into safe or efficient execution under resource constraints. We further show that exposing resource information can reduce avoidable overflows and improve resource utilization, making PeakBench a useful testbed for diagnosing resource-aware agent behavior. Code is available at https://github.com/Czzzk/Staggering-the-Peaks.