# MatReplace: A Reference-Free, Conditioning-Aligned Benchmark for Material Replacement in Interior Scenes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24107 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24107/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12242/) (2022)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14786/) (2025)
- [Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09276/) (2022)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15742/) (2025)
- [Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14683/) (2025)
- [MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10012/) (2023)
- [Hypersim: A Photorealistic Synthetic Dataset for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02523/) (2020)
- [Paint by Example: Exemplar-based Image Editing with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13227/) (2022)
- [AnyDoor: Zero-shot Object-level Image Customization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09481/) (2023)
- [3D-FRONT: 3D Furnished Rooms with layOuts and semaNTics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09127/) (2020)
- [Emu Edit: Precise Image Editing via Recognition and Generation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10089/) (2023)
- [OmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18871/) (2025)
- [Imagen Editor and EditBench: Advancing and Evaluating Text-Guided Image Inpainting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06909/) (2022)
- [Alchemist: Parametric Control of Material Properties with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02970/) (2023)
- [Material Palette: Extraction of Materials from a Single Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17060/) (2023)
- [ZeST: Zero-Shot Material Transfer from a Single Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06425/) (2024)
- [MatSwap: Light-aware material transfers in images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07784/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Material replacement is a common interior-design operation: changing the material of a selected surface while preserving its geometry, surroundings, and illumination. Despite its commercial relevance, no public benchmark isolates this task, and evaluating it is challenging. Reference-based metrics penalize valid outputs in this inherently one-to-many setting, favor the style of the reference generator, and cannot fairly compare editors that receive different forms of guidance. We introduce MatReplace, a reference-free benchmark that evaluates edits along four verifiable dimensions: local material correctness, global lighting harmony, outside preservation, and inside structure. It defines three tracks that vary one conditioning signal at a time: (A) instruction only, (B) instruction plus region mask, and (C) material reference image instead of instruction. Our results reveal a clear divide between naming and visually grounding materials. In Track A, leading closed-source editors achieve exemplar-level material rendering and surpass the exemplar anchor under our primary aggregate. In Track B, masks help only mask-compatible models with weak scene preservation, with task-paired, single-seed effects ranging from +0.137 to -0.090 across aligned model families. In Track C, reference-image conditioning degrades every family under both aggregates, by -0.031 to -0.508; in the worst cases, models repaint the reference image itself and perform worse than returning the input unchanged. Thus, named-material rendering is largely solved by the strongest closed editors on this distribution, but grounding materials from pixels remains an open challenge. Expert ratings validate our ranking (Kendall's tau = 0.68) and align with our aggregates more closely than GT-referenced or CLIP-based baselines.