# AgentRoom: Concurrent Multi-Agent Coding in a CRDT-Backed Shared Workspace

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23740 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23740/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21819/) (2024)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [Self-Organized Agents: A LLM Multi-Agent Framework toward Ultra Large-Scale Code Generation and Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02183/) (2024)
- [AgileCoder: Dynamic Collaborative Agents for Software Development based on Agile Methodology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11912/) (2024)
- [Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08604/) (2024)
- [CodeCoR: An LLM-Based Self-Reflective Multi-Agent Framework for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07811/) (2025)
- [CODESIM: Multi-Agent Code Generation and Problem Solving through Simulation-Driven Planning and Debugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05664/) (2025)
- [CodeCRDT: Observation-Driven Coordination for Multi-Agent LLM Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18893/) (2025)
- [Enhancing LLM Code Generation: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Collaboration and Runtime Debugging for Improved Accuracy, Reliability, and Latency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02133/) (2025)
- [A Conflict-Free Replicated JSON Datatype](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03960/) (2016)
- [SEMAG: Self-Evolutionary Multi-Agent Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15707/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Software Process Models for Multi-Agent Class-Level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09794/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Concurrent multi-agent coding promises division of labor across modules, robustness through redundancy, and parallel exploration at the natural granularity of multi-file projects. Realtime collaborative editing protocols solve this coordination problem for human teams via Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), but the LLMs underneath generate one token at a time and existing multi-agent coding systems inherit this serial limit: they either sequence agents through phase handoffs or pool independent samples without coordination, and a single agent abandons up to half of hard tasks with a one-file stub-and-exit. AgentRoom is a realtime collaborative editing protocol for concurrent coding agents. Its runtime layer exposes file-level claim, status, and broadcast as MCP tools on a CRDT-merged shared filesystem. Five frontier coding-CLI models ran four backend coding tasks, with cross-language checks in Python DevBench and Rust+axum. For CLI-stable models, AgentRoom with 2 agents abandons fewer tasks than Solo and has less run-to-run variation. At matched-compute, one positive mean LLM-judge contrast puts AgentRoom over parallel-merge. The other contrast, a bundle probe, puts full AgentRoom above each partial case: an ordering rather than a percentage split. Coordination, not parallelism or CRDT-merge, bears the load.