# DPIAgent: Divide, Protocol, Isolate for Agentic Reproduction Test Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23341 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23341/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12952/) (2024)
- [Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23370/) (2025)
- [SWE-bench Goes Live!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23419/) (2025)
- [Kimi-Dev: Agentless Training as Skill Prior for SWE-Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23045/) (2025)
- [Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13069/) (2025)
- [TDD-Bench Verified: Can LLMs Generate Tests for Issues Before They Get Resolved?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02883/) (2024)
- [Otter: Generating Tests from Issues to Validate SWE Patches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05368/) (2025)
- [Agentic Bug Reproduction for Effective Automated Program Repair at Google](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01821/) (2025)
- [Issue Localization via LLM-Driven Iterative Code Graph Searching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22424/) (2025)
- [RPG: A Repository Planning Graph for Unified and Scalable Codebase Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16198/) (2025)
- [Issue2Test: Generating Reproducing Test Cases from Issue Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16320/) (2025)
- [AssertFlip: Reproducing Bugs via Inversion of LLM-Generated Passing Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17542/) (2025)
- [Heterogeneous Prompting and Execution Feedback for SWE Issue Test Generation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06365/) (2025)
- [TestExplora: Benchmarking LLMs for Proactive Bug Discovery via Repository-Level Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10471/) (2026)
- [A Survey on What Developers Think About Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01154/) (2023)
- [SWE-Tester: Training Open-Source LLMs for Issue Reproduction in Real-World Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13713/) (2026)
- [Echo: Graph-Enhanced Retrieval and Execution Feedback for Issue Reproduction Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07326/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reproduction test generation, producing a failing-then-passing test that captures a reported bug, is a critical step in automated software engineering. Existing agentic methods treat this as a monolithic loop, despite the task inherently comprising two subtasks of distinct nature: diagnosing the root cause and writing a fail-to-pass test. Without explicit separation, the agent faces a compound objective with underspecified intermediate goals, leading to goal drift. We propose DPIAgent, a structured agentic framework built on three principles, Divide, Protocol, Isolate (DPI), that mitigates compound-objective ambiguity and goal drift: it Divides the task into single-objective phases of defect exploration and test generation; enforces a handoff Protocol that records the diagnosis and test plan, preventing context loss; and Isolates each phase's action space by tailoring the toolset to its task, preventing irrelevant tools from misleading execution. On SWT-Bench Verified, DPIAgent outperforms seven baselines across three backbone LLMs. With DPI alone it reaches 81.76% success rate on GPT-5, the highest reported among open-source methods, gaining up to 11.88 points over the strongest baseline on GPT-5-Mini; adding test selection further raises it to 86.17%. Our analysis shows that architectural structure and backbone capability are complementary axes rather than substitutes, demonstrating DPI's generalizability across model classes.