# When More Modalities Hurt: Modality Dropout for Heavy-Duty Vehicle Engine Diagnostics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23161 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23161/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01728/) (2023)
- [AudioCLIP: Extending CLIP to Image, Text and Audio](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13043/) (2021)
- [PromptCast: A New Prompt-based Learning Paradigm for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08964/) (2022)
- [TEST: Text Prototype Aligned Embedding to Activate LLM's Ability for Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08241/) (2023)
- [Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05856/) (2024)
- [SensorLLM: Aligning Large Language Models with Motion Sensors for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10624/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Heavy-duty vehicle diagnostics generate three disconnected data modalities: unstructured multi- lingual service complaints, high-dimensional sensor telemetry with over 80% missing values, and Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs). We investigate whether fusing these modalities improves engine component classification on a proprietary dataset from a major truck manufacturer. Through 5-fold cross-validation across multiple model configurations spanning three model families on five engine component classes (885 samples, the full cross-database matched population for this manufacturer), we find that naive fusion provides modest gains over text alone (65.3%). However, modality dropout during training, which randomly disables entire modalities per batch, forces the network to exploit weaker inputs and achieves 68.8% accuracy on text+DTC fusion (weighted F1: 0.67), a 3.5-point improvement over text-only (65.3%, weighted F1: 0.64) and the best result across all methods including logistic regression and gradient-boosted trees. Per-class analysis shows that the dominant modality varies by fault type: text describes symptoms, DTCs encode structured fault signals, and sensors measure physical state. On intake/exhaust faults, sensors alone reach 93% where text achieves 80%. On fuel system faults, fusion with modality dropout nearly triples accuracy from 15% to 38% over text alone. To our knowledge, this is the first application of three-way modality fusion combining text, sensors, and fault codes in industrial vehicle diagnostics.