# Knowing Isn't Always Saying: When Do Spatial Encodings Reach Answers in Vision-Language Models?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22916 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22916/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 35 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Modeling Context in Referring Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00272/) (2016)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17811/) (2025)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01773/) (2025)
- [Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06287/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19418/) (2025)
- [MIRAGE: The Illusion of Visual Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21687/) (2026)
- [Seeing but Not Believing: Probing the Disconnect Between Visual Attention and Answer Correctness in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17771/) (2025)
- [VLM-R3: Region Recognition, Reasoning, and Refinement for Enhanced Multimodal Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16192/) (2025)
- [Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18108/) (2024)
- [Head Pursuit: Probing Attention Specialization in Multimodal Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21518/) (2025)
- [Linear Mechanisms for Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12626/) (2026)
- [Arbitration Failure, Not Perceptual Blindness: How Vision-Language Models Resolve Visual-Linguistic Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09364/) (2026)
- [GroundingME: Exposing the Visual Grounding Gap in MLLMs through Multi-Dimensional Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17495/) (2025)
- [How Vision Becomes Language: A Layer-wise Information-Theoretic Analysis of Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15580/) (2026)
- [CoFFT: Chain of Foresight-Focus Thought for Visual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22010/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought Degrades Visual Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16060/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [When Words Speak Louder than Images: Towards Understanding Language Bias in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35272/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models are known to encode spatial information in their hidden states, yet often fail to use it when answering. However, it remains unclear when and where this encoded information reaches the answer. We address this with direction patching, a class-conditioned causal intervention applied across layers, token positions, and prompt formats. Using spatial-ID directions constructed following prior encoding evidence, we find that causal influence on answer logits emerges only at mid-to-deep depths. Text chain-of-thought suppresses immediate object-word argmax-level transport in most models, while visually grounded prompts keep it open. Positive target-logit gain can remain below the argmax threshold, and transport can re-emerge at the final prefix token or at the answer step in deeper layers. Across the ten VLMs we study, these local effects form descriptive transport patterns. Complementary experiments characterize how these patterns shift across datasets, attributes, and encoding amplitudes. Together, these results reframe the encoding-grounding gap as a problem of conditional transport in VLMs.