# SPOC-SQL: Stage-wise Preference Optimization for Controllable Text-to-SQL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22772 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22772/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04942/) (2019)
- [Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15363/) (2023)
- [RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05965/) (2023)
- [C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07306/) (2023)
- [MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11242/) (2023)
- [Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12627/) (2020)
- [Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12773/) (2020)
- [MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07467/) (2024)
- [ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17342/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL aims to translate natural language questions into executable SQL queries over relational databases, requiring multi-stage structured reasoning over database schemas and query constraints. However, existing methods treat this task as single-step generation, where models optimize entire SQL sequences without targeted feedback at key decision points and lack support for interacting with and controlling the intermediate generation process. To address this issue, we propose SPOC-SQL, which decomposes Text-to-SQL into four sequential subtasks following standard SQL execution logic and designs stage-specific optimization strategies for the model to learn key decisions. Specifically, we propose the implementation of fine-grained preference optimisation at key decision points across SQL stages, with the objective of enhancing structured decision-making during query construction. Furthermore, a structured decomposition strategy is designed, facilitating stage-wise intervention and correction through explicit intermediate representations. This results in more controllable and reliable SQL generation. Experiments demonstrate that incorporating stage-wise human knowledge consistently improves performance, validating the effectiveness of stage perception controllable generation.