# XTC: Head-Aware Sampling by Excluding Top Choices

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22758 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22758/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00978/) (2023)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04475/) (2024)
- [CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05858/) (2019)
- [Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01937/) (2023)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06499/) (2021)
- [Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15097/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06196/) (2024)
- [Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04319/) (2019)
- [Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01886/) (2018)
- [MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01454/) (2021)
- [Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06452/) (2023)
- [FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05218/) (2021)
- [DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03883/) (2023)
- [PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05087/) (2023)
- [Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02424/) (2016)
- [Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14799/) (2020)
- [A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06417/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Standard decoding rules for autoregressive language models promote diversity by rescaling the full next-token distribution or truncating its low-probability tail. These strategies overlook a common regime of open-ended generation in which several continuations are plausible but too much probability mass remains concentrated on the most generic choice. We introduce XTC (Exclude Top Choices), a lightweight head-aware decoding operator that targets this regime directly. XTC identifies tokens whose probabilities exceed an absolute plausibility threshold τ: when at least two qualify, it removes the dominant eligible choices with probability ρ and retains only the weakest plausible alternative before renormalization. Across 60 experiments on Gemma 3 27B Q4, Gemma 3 12B Q6, and DeepSeek R1 14B Q6, with scaling validation on Llama 3.3 70B Q4, XTC improves the diversity-repetition Pareto frontier. On creative generation, Distinct-2 increases by 11--15% and repeat trigrams decrease by 27--47% across the four models. Combined with temperature scaling, gains reach 38% in Distinct-2 and 71% in repeat-trigram reduction over baseline. A blinded Amazon Mechanical Turk study with 150 Master raters yields a 62.3% creativity preference for XTC (p<10-4) without reduced fluency, while a GPT-4o control judge reproduces the Anthropic-judge direction on every measure. On IFEval with Llama 3.3 70B Q4, XTC preserves prompt-level strict accuracy within 1.7 percentage points of baseline while recovering most of the diversity gain; a temperature setting matched on Distinct-2 reduces IFEval by 8.8 points. The effect is additive with temperature and repetition penalties, robust across quantization levels and model families, and consistent across twelve prompt genres. XTC has been adopted by llama.cpp, ExLlamaV2, and text-generation-webui.