# When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22339 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22339/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent skill learning and evolution, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent skill learning and evolution](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-skill-learning-and-evolution/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11511/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14403/) (2024)
- [AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18901/) (2024)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [Ghost in the Minecraft: Generally Capable Agents for Open-World Environments via Large Language Models with Text-based Knowledge and Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17144/) (2023)
- [Inducing Programmatic Skills for Agentic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06821/) (2025)
- [SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02268/) (2026)
- [Skill-Pro: Learning Reusable Skills from Experience via Non-Parametric PPO for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01869/) (2026)
- [Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08499/) (2026)
- [ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00380/) (2026)
- [When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25864/) (2026)
- [Implicit Hierarchical GRPO: Decoupling Tool Invocation from Execution for Tool-Integrated Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18500/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [GraphSkillAA: Attribution-Guided Skill-Graph Updating with Targeted Validation and Rollback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20455/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Extracting skills from past successes is critical for the efficient evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents. Prevailing agent self-evolution paradigms typically rely on a core assumption: equipping LLMs with skill memories derived from successful trajectories will monotonically improve their problem-solving capabilities. However, probe analyses reveal that extracting skills solely from successful trajectories traps the model in a Skill Imitation Trap. For tasks that resemble past successes but require different tools, retrieving more skills paradoxically increases the model's confidence in wrong tool calls---procedure skills raise the wrong-tool margin by 47% over a memory-free baseline. To overcome this limitation, we propose Boundary-Aware Skill Memory (BASM), which augments each skill with explicit boundary fields---applicability conditions, risk cues, avoidance rules, and recovery notes. These fields transform each retrieved skill from an unconditional action template into state-conditioned guidance: the agent applies the skill when its conditions hold, suppresses inapplicable tool calls when they do not, and issues targeted repairs when execution fails. Across three agent benchmarks and four model scales, BASM consistently outperforms success-distilled skill-memory baselines: it improves task success rate by up to 23.8% on AppWorld, accuracy by up to 5.0% on BFCL, and reduces attack success rate by 4.6% on AgentDojo, while simultaneously reducing average AppWorld steps by up to 6.6% relative to the memory-free baseline.