# ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21101 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21101/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06674/) (2023)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03160/) (2025)
- [Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlighting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14720/) (2024)
- [ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemma](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21772/) (2024)
- [AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18666/) (2025)
- [AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05993/) (2024)
- [LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06664/) (2024)
- [Skill-Inject: Measuring Agent Vulnerability to Skill File Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20156/) (2026)
- [Design Patterns for Securing LLM Agents against Prompt Injections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08837/) (2025)
- [Beyond Self-Talk: A Communication-Centric Survey of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14321/) (2025)
- [The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26494/) (2026)
- [A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19676/) (2025)
- [AgentDoG: A Diagnostic Guardrail Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18491/) (2026)
- [MiniMax Sparse Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13392/) (2026)
- [SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12015/) (2026)
- [Attack the Messages, Not the Agents: A Multi-round Adaptive Stealthy Tampering Framework for LLM-MAS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03125/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language model (LLM) agents move from conversation to executing code, reading local files, and orchestrating external tools, a single agent hijacked by a malicious third-party skill can cause data exfiltration, privilege escalation, or cascading compromise. We argue that agentic risk is progressive: it can enter at four loci of the agent control loop--skill admission, invocation-time intent, execution-time effect, and post-action consequence--while a denied dangerous objective can reappear across surface forms, tools, or turns; existing safeguards are typically local to one lifecycle boundary or one call. Guided by this threat model, we present ClawSentry, an open-source, framework-agnostic security supervision gateway for agent runtimes. Before a skill package is ever executed, First-use Skill Package Review (FSPR) audits it under a deterministic evidence floor, escalating unresolved cases to bounded read-only agentic review (locus A). At runtime, a three-tier progressive decision engine--a deterministic L1 layer, a rule-anchored L2 semantic reviewer, and a read-only L3 evidence-seeking agent--spends contextual review only on the residual ambiguity, while a session-level anti-bypass mechanism recognizes tool-switching and rephrased retries (loci B--C); a post-action path feeds high-severity evidence non-retroactively into later review (locus D). An Agent Harness Protocol (AHP) abstraction applies one policy across Codex, Claude Code, Kimi CLI, and Gemini CLI without modifying agent internals. On SkillInject with Codex/GPT-5.4, contextual ASR falls from 39.55% to 2.61% while contextual TSR moves only from 83.78% to 83.05%. Across five Work Agents on the full SkillsSafety benchmark, ClawSentry confines ASR to 9.09--15.03% from 33.5--49.7% unprotected, and aggregate TSR on clean skills remains 98.7%.