# PSK at WMT 2026 MIST: Task-Specialized QLoRA Adapters for Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20757 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20757/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01852/) (2020)
- [TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05002/) (2020)
- [MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07475/) (2019)
- [The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16884/) (2023)
- [Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06619/) (2024)
- [WikiLingua: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Lingual Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03093/) (2020)
- [CrossSum: Beyond English-Centric Cross-Lingual Summarization for 1,500+ Language Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08804/) (2021)
- [MCIF: Multimodal Crosslingual Instruction-Following Benchmark from Scientific Talks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19634/) (2025)
- [UPDESH: Synthesizing Grounded Instruction Tuning Data for 13 Indic Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21294/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We describe the PSK submission to the WMT 2026 Multilingual Instruction Shared Task. Our system uses the 3.35B-parameter Tiny Aya Global model with three QLoRA adapters, one for each task. The adapters are trained on multilingual document-summary pairs, passage-based question answering, and filtered standalone question answering. The summarization data also includes scientific papers with their author-written abstracts. On our held-out split, the context and summarization adapters perform better than our multitask adapter, which was trained only on data supplied by the organizers. Results for open QA are mixed and vary with answer length and evaluation method. We therefore submit three systems with the same context and summarization adapters but different open-QA adapters.