# Inducing Task Models from Computer-Use Traces

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20319 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20319/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01614/) (2024)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [Ferret-UI: Grounded Mobile UI Understanding with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05719/) (2024)
- [SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20087/) (2026)
- [Creating General User Models from Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10831/) (2025)
- [VideoAgentTrek: Computer Use Pretraining from Unlabeled Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19488/) (2025)
- [How Do AI Agents Do Human Work? Comparing AI and Human Workflows Across Diverse Occupations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22780/) (2025)
- [Watch and Learn: Learning to Use Computers from Online Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04673/) (2025)
- [Grounding Agent Memory in Contextual Intent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10702/) (2026)
- [Sharingan: Extract User Action Sequence from Desktop Recordings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.08768/) (2024)
- [MS4UI: A Dataset for Multi-modal Summarization of User Interface Instructional Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12623/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Naturalistic computer-use traces, passively recorded screenshots and mouse or keyboard actions, are a valuable resource for deriving symbolic, auditable, and reusable models of how everyday work is done. Such models matter as computer-use agents enter real work, where agents need to learn how tasks are actually performed, and organizations need to audit and reuse that knowledge. However, inducing such task models is challenging, as activity is observed only as low-level events and real-world work is multi-threaded with interleaved goals. Existing methods assume a given task or a single workflow, and produce step-level summaries rather than structured task models. We introduce Task Model Induction (TMI), which (i) discovers the latent tasks in an unconstrained trace, disentangling concurrent activity, and (ii) for each latent task, induces a task model pairing a hierarchical objective model of recursive goal decomposition with a procedure model of the control flow that organized the execution. Intrinsically, on controlled human and agent trajectories, TMI recovers interleaved tasks with 0.974 agreement against ground-truth groupings and reconstructs 74.9% of the observed execution steps, far more than the strongest workflow induction baseline. Extrinsically, skills derived from TMI's task models improve held-out task accuracy by 30.0% over the strongest baseline.
