# Question-Guided Evidence Acquisition for Multimodal Visual Question Answering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19739 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19739/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [VisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10594/) (2024)
- [ColPali: Efficient Document Retrieval with Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01449/) (2024)
- [Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00212/) (2025)
- [TextMonkey: An OCR-Free Large Multimodal Model for Understanding Document](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04473/) (2024)
- [mPLUG-DocOwl2: High-resolution Compressing for OCR-free Multi-page Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03420/) (2024)
- [M3DocRAG: Multi-modal Retrieval is What You Need for Multi-page Multi-document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04952/) (2024)
- [PaddleOCR-VL: Boosting Multilingual Document Parsing via a 0.9B Ultra-Compact Vision-Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14528/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19418/) (2025)
- [MDocAgent: A Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Framework for Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13964/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Spot: Interactive Reasoning Improves Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12966/) (2024)
- [VDocRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Visually-Rich Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09795/) (2025)
- [Building a Manga Dataset "Manga109" with Annotations for Multimedia Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04425/) (2020)
- [TextCoT: Zoom In for Enhanced Multimodal Text-Rich Image Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09797/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Generation for Document Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16470/) (2025)
- [SimpleDoc: Multi-Modal Document Understanding with Dual-Cue Page Retrieval and Iterative Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14035/) (2025)
- [Marten: Visual Question Answering with Mask Generation for Multi-modal Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14140/) (2025)
- [CoMix: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Task Comic Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03550/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent VQA: Exploring Multi-Agent Foundation Models in Zero-Shot Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14783/) (2024)
- [ToolVQA: A Dataset for Multi-step Reasoning VQA with External Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03284/) (2025)
- [BigDocs: An Open Dataset for Training Multimodal Models on Document and Code Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04626/) (2024)
- [A Survey on MLLM-based Visually Rich Document Understanding: Methods, Challenges, and Emerging Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09861/) (2025)
- [AgenticOCR: Parsing Only What You Need for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.24134/) (2026)
- [PIVOT: Bridging Planning and Execution in LLM Agents via Trajectory Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11225/) (2026)
- [Watermark Text Pattern Spotting in Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05167/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Document VQA Models via Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18984/) (2025)
- [Orion: A Unified Visual Agent for Multimodal Perception, Advanced Visual Reasoning and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14210/) (2025)
- [ARIAL: An Agentic Framework for Document VQA with Precise Answer Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18192/) (2025)
- [Bidirectional Long-Range Parser for Sequential Data Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05210/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal LLMs can see a document, but they often can't read it reliably. Small text, tables, visual cues, and topological elements still trip them up under direct visual inference, even when the page is already sitting in the model's context. Most document-VQA systems treat perception as fixed: they encode the page once, ask the question, and answer from whatever the model happened to extract in that single fast pass. We think document VQA needs slower, more deliberate perception: rather than answering from one fixed encoding, the model should spend a bit of extra compute at inference time working out what to look at next, and only then answer. We build this into Q-Guide, a small agent that reads a question, works out what evidence it is still missing, and calls targeted tool(s) to recover it---reading text where text is needed, zooming in where detail is needed, or grounding a region where position matters. On DocVQA2026 and Manga109, Q-Guide outperforms both direct prompting and recent multi-agent document systems (65.0% vs. 40.0% on DocVQA2026, 32.4% vs. 24.4% on Manga109), and the improvement holds across three Claude backbones (Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.5). We find that accuracy scales with the perception budget---most of the gain appears within two to three deliberate rounds---and that the gain comes from directing perception to the right place, not from complex control logic: adding planners, routers, or multiple collaborating agents does not help.
