# When Guidance Goes Off-Scale: Recalibrating Diffusion Transformers under Analog Compute-in-Memory Nonidealities

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19644 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19644/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [DPM-Solver: A Fast ODE Solver for Diffusion Probabilistic Model Sampling in Around 10 Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00927/) (2022)
- [Demystifying MMD GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01401/) (2018)
- [Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06991/) (2019)
- [Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09797/) (2020)
- [Common Diffusion Noise Schedules and Sample Steps are Flawed](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08891/) (2023)
- [Applying Guidance in a Limited Interval Improves Sample and Distribution Quality in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07724/) (2024)
- [CFG++: Manifold-constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08070/) (2024)
- [Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02416/) (2024)
- [Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Corrector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09000/) (2024)
- [Classifier-Free Guidance inside the Attraction Basin May Cause Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16738/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Compute-in-Memory for Efficient Generative Model Inference in TPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00461/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) incur high memory traffic and energy costs because sampling repeatedly evaluates large denoisers dominated by linear operations. Analog compute-in-memory (CIM) can alleviate these costs by executing linear operations within weight-storing memory arrays. However, CIM nonidealities perturb effective weights, with errors accumulating along the state-dependent denoising trajectory; their interaction with classifier-free guidance (CFG) remains underexplored. In this paper, we characterize the impact of analog CIM nonidealities on DiT sampling. Although conditional and unconditional predictions can each remain close to their clean counterparts, their difference (the CFG residual) is disproportionately attenuated and rotated. Identifying this residual as a controllable failure channel, we propose a retraining-free, sampler-side recalibration that adjusts only the CFG scale for a given CIM condition. Trajectory-level analysis shows that moderate recalibration strengthens the target-oriented component preserved in the distorted residual, enabling earlier commitment to a prompt-consistent semantic region. In contrast, excessive guidance amplifies the full noisy residual and degrades quality, resulting in a finite, noise-dependent optimum. Extensive experiments on PixArt-Sigma, PixArt-alpha, and DiT-XL/2 show that the optimal guidance scale increases with CIM noise. Using 30,000 samples per condition, guidance recalibration consistently restores generation quality across simulated CIM mappings, closing at least 87% of the CIM-induced FID gap at a CIM noise level of 0.20. It reduces FID from 59.22 to 20.49 on PixArt-Sigma, 72.37 to 21.12 on PixArt-alpha, and 20.89 to 6.62 on DiT-XL/2.