# ReWEIGH the Evidence: Calibrating Token-Level Ordinal Visual Evidence to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19075 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19075/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14525/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17911/) (2023)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14003/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18715/) (2024)
- [Paying More Attention to Image: A Training-Free Method for Alleviating Hallucination in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21771/) (2024)
- [HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00425/) (2024)
- [Interpreting and Editing Vision-Language Representations to Mitigate Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02762/) (2024)
- [Self-Introspective Decoding: Alleviating Hallucinations for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02032/) (2024)
- [DAMRO: Dive into the Attention Mechanism of LVLM to Reduce Object Hallucination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04514/) (2024)
- [CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01920/) (2024)
- [Revisit What You See: Revealing Visual Semantics in Vision Tokens to Guide LVLM Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09522/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) often hallucinate, generating content that the input image does not support. Preventing such content during decoding calls for a candidate-specific measure of how strongly the image supports the token under consideration. The model's visual-token states offer a natural source of this evidence because projecting each state through the output head reveals which vocabulary items that position favors. These position-wise readouts cannot be pooled directly because their probability magnitudes are not comparable across visual positions. Vocabulary ranks provide a scale-invariant basis for pooling, but tokens still differ systematically in their typical rank-based evidence. We propose ReWEIGH, a training-free decoding intervention that aggregates these ranks across visual positions and compares each candidate with a token-specific reference estimated from unlabeled images. At inference, ReWEIGH caches the image evidence during prefill and applies a bounded penalty only to candidates that fall below their reference. On four 7B backbones, ReWEIGH reduces hallucinated object mentions by up to 21.3% while largely preserving or improving descriptive and general performance. With evidence cached, the average added latency is 1.33% per token, and the reductions extend across six architecture families to 32B parameters.