# Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18271 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.18271/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 33 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)
- [Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03099/) (2015)
- [Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07947/) (2016)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06295/) (2015)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19897/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12275/) (2026)
- [Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24653/) (2026)
- [Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24472/) (2026)
- [Privileged Information Distillation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04942/) (2026)
- [Skill-SD: Skill-Conditioned Self-Distillation for Multi-turn LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10674/) (2026)
- [Autoregressive Knowledge Distillation through Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07253/) (2020)
- [Nemotron-Cascade 2: Post-Training LLMs with Cascade RL and Multi-Domain On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19220/) (2026)
- [MegaScience: Pushing the Frontiers of Post-Training Datasets for Science Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16812/) (2025)
- [UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00334/) (2025)
- [The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11182/) (2026)
- [Rethinking On-Policy Self-Distillation for Thinking Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05184/) (2026)
- [GATES: Self-Distillation under Privileged Context with Consensus Gating](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20574/) (2026)
- [Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02234/) (2026)
- [Respecting Self-Uncertainty in On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13255/) (2026)
- [ROSD: Reflective On-Policy Self-Distillation for Language Model Reasoning across Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28014/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [What Does Privileged Information Add to On-Policy Self-Distillation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20612/) (2026)
- [What Should a Self-Teacher See? Privileged Context Design for On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25623/) (2026)
- [When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38995/) (2026)
- [Diagnosing On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39118/) (2026)
- [Learning When and How to Intervene: A Hindsight-Distilled Sentinel for Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39957/) (2026)
- [PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00949/) (2026)
- [Hindsight Structured Advice Distillation: Steering Executor Agents with Advisors Trained on Their Failures and Task Characteristics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13000/) (2026)
- [Does self-distillation improve reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18613/) (2026)
- [Learning from Self-Generated Responses: Reliability--Uncertainty Self-Distillation for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19176/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) trains a student on its own responses using token-level supervision from the same model conditioned on privileged reference information. We investigate whether performance gains from OPSD show that the student learned the information in the reference or instead reflect recovery of reasoning behavior already present in the base model. We perform OPSD experiments on science and mathematics datasets using Qwen3 models ranging from 1.7B to 8B. Our analysis framework separates the supervision induced by the reference from the supervision provided by the teacher without the reference and measures how each aligns with changes in the student's predictions. The correct reference does not provide a consistent performance benefit across teacher generation modes, model sizes, and training datasets. Students can improve without the correct reference, and a solution from another problem can outperform the correct solution on several mathematical reasoning benchmarks. The student's predictions align more strongly with the base model's thinking behavior than with the supervision induced by the reference, but controls constructed from other problems reproduce much of both alignments. Moreover, stronger alignment attributable to the correct reference does not reliably coincide with a greater performance benefit from the reference. Performance gains and distributional alignment alone therefore cannot determine how privileged reference information contributes to student learning in OPSD.