# From Global Benchmarks to Local Evaluations: Benchmarking LLMs for the German Public Sector

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17827 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17827/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02243/) (2019)
- [Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03304/) (2024)
- [Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16786/) (2024)
- [BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12990/) (2024)
- [EUR-Lex-Sum: A Multi- and Cross-lingual Dataset for Long-form Summarization in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13448/) (2022)
- [GermanQuAD and GermanDPR: Improving Non-English Question Answering and Passage Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12741/) (2021)
- [SEA-HELM: Southeast Asian Holistic Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14301/) (2025)
- [Unveiling Environmental Impacts of Large Language Model Serving: A Functional Unit View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11256/) (2025)
- [The CitizenQuery Benchmark: A Novel Dataset and Evaluation Pipeline for Measuring LLM Performance in Citizen Query Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04064/) (2026)
- [M"OVE: A Holistic LLM Benchmark for the German Public Sector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13111/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Public institutions face a persistent challenge in selecting LLMs suited to their specific context. Existing benchmarks, however, are of limited use as they primarily reflect English-language and US-centric settings, and often only evaluate task performance. In this paper, we present first results of M"OVE, a holistic evaluation framework for the German public sector, examining three rarely considered governance dimensions: energy consumption, provider transparency, and knowledge of German-party positions. Our results reveal significant trade-offs, with no single model excelling across all dimensions: estimated energy consumption varies more than 60-fold and is not explained by model size alone, information disclosure varies systematically across providers, and European models do not exhibit stronger knowledge of German party positions. Model selection for public institutions thus cannot rely on performance rankings alone. Instead, evaluations should also reflect the governance requirements of the deployment context.