# Write, Execute, Refine: From Skill Follower to Skill Optimizer via Reinforcement Learning from Execution Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17587 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17587/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08234/) (2026)
- [PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16427/) (2023)
- [Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25158/) (2026)
- [SoK: Agentic Skills -- Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20867/) (2026)
- [EvoSkill: Automated Skill Discovery for Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02766/) (2026)
- [SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02268/) (2026)
- [Contextual Experience Replay for Self-Improvement of Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06698/) (2025)
- [SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01139/) (2026)
- [Skill-R1: Agent Skill Evolution via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09359/) (2026)
- [ReSkill: Reconciling Skill Creation with Policy Optimization in Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01619/) (2026)
- [Skill0.5: Joint Skill Internalization and Utilization for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28424/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SkillSpec: Consensus-Gated Agent Skill Evolution via Representation Specialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00704/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Expert-written natural language skills can improve tool-using agents, yet agent-authored skills perform 8--11 points worse than using no skill. While inference-time loops can repair individual skills per task, they leave the underlying generator's refinement capability unimproved. We study how to organize execution experience from intermediate skills into training states for an optimizer. We introduce WER(Write, Execute, and Refine), a multi-phase framework that trains a Skill Optimizer outside a frozen executor. The optimizer proposes skills, a frozen agent executes each repeatedly, and a programmatic verifier scores the outcomes. These scores serve as group-relative rewards and filter for informative, mixed-outcome instances. Matched successful and failed trajectories from these records form the next phase's refinement states, so the optimizer learns from the consequences of its earlier outputs. On BFCL v4 multi-turn and tau2-bench, WER improves average Pass@1 over the no-skill baseline by 7.80 and 6.06 points, respectively. Under an identical refinement workflow, it outperforms the same backbone without optimizer training by 10.02 and 12.50 points. Notably, our trained 4B optimizer achieves 76.63% on BFCL v4, outperforming all evaluated off-the-shelf general-purpose LLMs in the same role on average. Our code is available at https://github.com/littlepkk/wer-training.