# To Remove or Not to Remove Clouds: A Comparative Analysis and Fusion of Raw SAR and Synthetic NDWI for Overcast Water Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17398 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17398/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15203/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01206/) (2016)
- [Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Cloud Removal in Global and All-Season Sentinel-2 Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07683/) (2020)
- [GLF-CR: SAR-Enhanced Cloud Removal with Global-Local Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02850/) (2022)
- [Seeing Through Clouds in Satellite Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08408/) (2021)
- [Conditional Brownian Bridge Diffusion Model for VHR SAR to Optical Image Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07947/) (2024)
- [A light-weight model to generate NDWI from Sentinel-1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13357/) (2025)
- [CloudBreaker: Breaking the Cloud Covers of Sentinel-2 Images using Multi-Stage Trained Conditional Flow Matching on Sentinel-1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03608/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Persistent clouds blind optical satellites during floods. While Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) penetrates clouds, its raw data is noisy and lacks clear contrast. To mitigate this, recent studies utilize deep learning models to translate SAR into cloud-free synthetic optical imagery for downstream tasks like water body segmentation. However, because raw SAR is the original source for both of these operations, a critical methodological dilemma arises: during complete overcast should segmentation models process the raw SAR directly, or rely on a translated synthetic Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) proxy? This study resolves the debate by demonstrating that synthetic NDWI yields better results, as the translation process acts as a powerful filter against radar noise. This raises a natural second question: what if we utilize both? Building on our findings, we introduce a Combined Framework that integrates both raw SAR and synthetic NDWI into a unified model. By fusing the sharp physical boundaries of raw SAR with the high contrast of synthetic NDWI, this hybrid approach consistently outperforms all standalone methods.
