# Robo-Dopamine 2.0: History-Conditioned and OOD-Aware Process Reward Modeling for Robotic Manipulation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15680 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15680/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 4 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Vision-language-action models / [Reinforcement learning and post-training](https://mlsanity.com/vla/reinforcement-learning-and-post-training/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)
- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for robot locomotion and manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-robot-locomotion-and-manipulation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [AgiBot World Colosseo: A Large-scale Manipulation Platform for Scalable and Intelligent Embodied Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06669/) (2025)
- [ConRFT: A Reinforced Fine-tuning Method for VLA Models via Consistency Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05450/) (2025)
- [RLinf: Flexible and Efficient Large-scale Reinforcement Learning via Macro-to-Micro Flow Transformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15965/) (2025)
- [Video-Language Critic: Transferable Reward Functions for Language-Conditioned Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19988/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action (VLA) models improve robotic manipulation but remain vulnerable to compounding errors, scene changes, and off-trajectory states. Reinforcement learning can refine pretrained VLA policies, yet sparse success signals hinder exploration, while engineered dense rewards are costly and task-specific. Existing learned visual reward models often rely on static before-after observations, causing temporal ambiguity and weak discrimination between robustness-preserving variations and task-invalid failures under out-of-distribution (OOD) execution. We introduce Robo-Dopamine 2.0, a history- and OOD-aware process reward model with a pairwise prediction interface. It combines (1) history-conditioned pairwise rewards that use source-aligned reference panels for synthetic OOD queries and observed rollout history for online queries, while preserving the queried endpoints, and (2) an OOD-aware signed progress space that represents valid progress, robustness, failure, and recovery. A Signed-Hop Curriculum with transition-aware replay learns coarse execution ordering before fine-grained progress calibration. We also construct an OOD trajectory dataset and a five-family benchmark. Reference panels improve mean visual order consistency (VOC) from 0.967 to 0.986 and OOD-robust VOC from 0.906 to 0.958. With the same 400K pairwise-reward budget, Signed-Hop training with 25% replay reaches 0.9872 mean VOC, compared with 0.9858 for a matched-pool shuffled control. In downstream reinforcement learning, the full model achieves 86.8% mean RoboTwin success and 71/80 successful real-world insertions.