# Who Leads Now? Token-Level Modality Arbitration for Chart-to-Code Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15510 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15510/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05482/) (2022)
- [TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01708/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03099/) (2023)
- [GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01006/) (2025)
- [ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09961/) (2024)
- [TimeSuite: Improving MLLMs for Long Video Understanding via Grounded Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19702/) (2024)
- [MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11453/) (2024)
- [ChartCoder: Advancing Multimodal Large Language Model for Chart-to-Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06598/) (2025)
- [Merging Multi-Task Models via Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00433/) (2024)
- [WebCode2M: A Real-World Dataset for Code Generation from Webpage Designs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06369/) (2024)
- [ChartEdit: How Far Are MLLMs From Automating Chart Analysis? Evaluating MLLMs' Capability via Chart Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11935/) (2025)
- [DocLayLLM: An Efficient Multi-modal Extension of Large Language Models for Text-rich Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15045/) (2024)
- [VisCodex: Unified Multimodal Code Generation via Merging Vision and Coding Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09945/) (2025)
- [ChartMaster: Advancing Chart-to-Code Generation with Real-World Charts and Chart Similarity Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17608/) (2025)
- [Boosting Chart-to-Code Generation in MLLM via Dual Preference-Guided Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02906/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Chart-to-code generation requires a model to read the fine-grained visual details of a chart and write executable code that reproduces it. Existing chart-to-code methods either train visual and coding abilities separately, or fine-tune on chart-to-code data with the two abilities entangled. Neither strategy accounts for the distinct nature of the two abilities or the interference that arises when they are optimized together. We propose MoCA (Mixture of Cross-modal Arbitration), which separates the two abilities rather than blending them. MoCA is built on Cross-modal Arbitration Block (CAB), which maintains a visual branch and a code branch as two distinct pathways, and a lightweight arbiter that arbitrates their relative contributions at every layer and generated token. We train MoCA in two stages: a supervised warm-up on self-distilled reasoning trajectories that decomposes visual understanding into explicit steps, followed by reinforcement learning with rewards on both the reasoning process and the final code. Analysis shows that the arbiter learns structured rather than arbitrary allocations, with expert contributions varying systematically across tokens, layers, and instances. Across three benchmarks, MoCA delivers competitive performance against general-domain and chart-specialized models. Ablation results show that the gains cannot be attributed to a larger model size alone, but instead arise from the joint contributions of complementary visual and code branch initialization and input-conditioned arbitration through CAB.